MoneyMaker FX Expert Advisor Robot Trading Account Прамая трансляцыя Наведайце вэб-сайт для атрымання дадатковай інфармацыі.
https://mmfx.vvip-members.com/ Звяжыцеся з намі
moneymakerfxea@gmail.com
Гандлёвы робат MoneyMaker FX EA
Гандлёвы робат Forex EA
https://mmfx.vvip-members.com/ Калі баланс вашага рахунку менш за 3000 долараў ЗША, адкрыйце рахунак у цэнтах FBS па спасылцы ніжэй.
https://fbs.com/cabinet/registration/trader/?ppu=9438088&account=stand&lang=en Калі баланс вашага рахунку перавышае 30 000 долараў ЗША, адкрыйце рахунак Tickmill Pro або VIP па спасылцы ніжэй.
https://secure.tickmill.com/?utm_campaign=ib_link&utm_content=IB79616275&utm_medium=%EA%B3%84%EC%A0%95+%EC%9C%A0%ED%98%95&utm_source=link&lp=https%3A%2F %2Ftickmill.com%2Fen%2Faccounts%2F
Гандлёвы робат MoneyMaker FX EA
Bitget, a cryptocurrency exchange, has introduced BitEXC, a trading platform tailored for the Vietnamese market.
Vietnam is now the second-largest country globally in terms of cryptocurrency ownership, with approximately 21.2% of its population holding digital assets. BitEXC aims to serve this expanding user base by offering a platform that meets local preferences and adheres to regulatory requirements.
Platform Offers Spot, Futures Trading
The platform includes spot trading and futures, with future plans for additional features such as copy trading, trading bots, and earning programs. It also supports fiat deposits via popular Vietnamese payment methods, making it easier for users to transact.
BitEXC offers customer support through chat, voice calls, and a VIP service with personalized account management and exclusive benefits.
The moment is here!📣 Our press conference has officially kicked off, with our CEO @GracyBitget announcing a groundbreaking partnership with BitEXC to empower Vietnam’s Web3 future 🇻🇳This vital collaboration marks a new chapter in driving innovation, adoption, and opportunities… pic.twitter.com/llZHaUdcdo
— Bitget (@bitgetglobal) December 3, 2024
According to the press release, security is a priority for BitEXC, which uses Bitget’s infrastructure to protect user funds and data. The Bitget Protection Fund, valued at over $300 million, will also be extended to BitEXC users.
“Vietnam has shown tremendous potential in crypto, but yet the market still needs platforms that truly understand and cater to its unique audience. BitEXC was created to bridge this gap by providing local support and products customized to fill the needs of its crypto users,” said Gracy Chen, CEO at Bitget and BitEXC.
Bitget Forms Crypto Partnership with LALIGA
Meanwhile, Bitget
has formed a partnership with Spain’s LALIGA, becoming its official crypto
partner for the Eastern, Southeast Asian, and Latin American regions, as
reported by Finance Magnates.
The agreement was announced at the Token2049 event in Singapore, marking
Bitget’s entry into the sports sector in emerging markets.
The multi-million-dollar deal provides Bitget with exposure
to LALIGA’s global fanbase, while the football league gains access to Web3
solutions. This partnership reflects Bitget’s focus on achieving success
through consistent effort.
This article was written by Tareq Sikder at www.financemagnates.com.
Feed from Financemagnates.com
Fundamental Overview
The US Dollar continues to consolidate around the highs as the market reached the peak in the repricing of interest rates expectations and it will need stronger reasons to price out the remaining rate cuts for 2025.
This was signalled by the lack of US Dollar strength after lots of strong US data with the market’s pricing remaining largely unchanged around three rate cuts by the end of 2025. We might see the greenback remaining on the backfoot at least until the US CPI due next week.
Yesterday, Fed’s Waller і Fed’s Williams sounded like a rate cut in December is basically a done deal with the plan to slow the pace of rate cuts considerably in 2025. We will likely need another hot CPI report to force them to skip the December cut.
On the NZD side, the RBNZ cut interest rates by 50 bps as expected recently but overall was less dovish than the market’s aggressive view. Right now, the market sees a 67% chance of a 25 bps cut in February 2025 and a total of 88 bps of easing by the end of next year.
NZDUSD Technical Analysis – Daily Timeframe
On the daily chart, we can see that NZDUSD probed above the key супраціў zone around the 0.5912 level but eventually failed to sustain the breakout. The buyers will want to see the price breaking higher to increase the bullish bets into the 0.6050 level next. The sellers, on the other hand, will likely continue to step in around the resistance to target a drop into the 0.5773 level.
NZDUSD Technical Analysis – 4 hour Timeframe
On the 4 hour chart, we can see that the recent price action formed an inverse head and shoulders. This is generally a signal of a loss in momentum, but the price will need to break above the neckline around the 0.5912 level to potentially trigger a rally into the 0.6050 resistance next.
NZDUSD Technical Analysis – 1 hour Timeframe
On the 1 hour chart, we can see that we have a minor support zone around the 0.5885 level where the price reacted from several times in the past days. The buyers will likely step in here to position for the break above the resistance. The sellers, on the other hand, will look for a break lower to target a drop into the lows. The red lines define the average daily range for today.
Upcoming Catalysts
Today, we get the US Job Openings data. Tomorrow, we have the US ADP, the US ISM Services PMI and Fed Chair Powell speaking. On Thursday, we get the latest US Jobless Claims figures. Finally, on Friday, we conclude the week with the US NFP report.
This article was written by Giuseppe Dellamotta at www.forexlive.com.
Feed from Forexlive.com
Finalto, a leading liquidity provider and fintech specialist, is proud to release the 2025 edition of its annual Watchlist, entitled Watchlist 2025: The World at a Crossroads.
Explaining the theme of this year’s edition, Finalto Chief Market Analyst Neil Wilson said: “We enter 2025 at a crossroads. The last two decades have been marked by flux and uncertainty, but in an increasingly fragmented and polarised world, the outcomes appear more binary than ever. War or peace; bulls or bears; populism or technocracy?”
You can download your copy of the Watchlist 2025 here: https://www.finalto.com/white-papers/the-watchlist-2025.
To capture this pivotal moment, Finalto’s annual Watchlist for 2025 takes the geopolitical inflection point as its subject. Finalto’s Watchlist 2025: The World at a Crossroads does not purport to be a set of predictions. Rather, the team have drawn on their close reading of the markets, macro conditions and global politics throughout 2024 to produce a series of extreme scenarios for the world in 2025.
“This year’s Watchlist is about coming to grips with volatility. By thinking through the ways that our collective future might unfurl, we aim to help bring into clearer relief the stakes, the challenges and the opportunities that face humanity in the coming year and beyond,” Wilson said.
From Washington to the Stars
Key themes include how Donald Trump’s administration will transform the world (or not), the political economy of Europe, whether Rachel Reeves will deliver on her part’s economic promises, South Africa’s economic prospects, plus a spotlight on the potential good and bad of the new generation of ‘miracle’ weight loss drugs like Ozempic.
The authors even ponder what the race to Mars might really mean for humanity.
The 2025 Watchlist builds on previous editions of the Watchlist, with reconsidering the trajectory of the global economy in the wake of Trump’s election, Labour’s electoral victory, China’s economic challenges and increasing tension in the Middle East, Ukraine and elsewhere.
In addition to the Watchlist itself, Finalto will roll out a series of posts and stories unpacking some of the core themes identified in this year’s edition.
For updates and news, please visit Finalto’s news and events page. For more information about Finalto’s award-winning liquidity and financial technology, please feel free to get in touch with the Finalto team directly.
This article was written by FM Contributors at www.financemagnates.com.
Feed from Financemagnates.com
In the intricate world of financial trading, contract for difference (CFD) proprietary trading firms, popularly known as prop firms, face unique challenges, particularly in managing order flow and hedging risks. CFDs, by nature, allow traders to speculate on price movements without owning the underlying asset, making them highly attractive due to their leverage but also fraught with complexities for those managing these trades.
B-Booking and Order Flow Management
One of the lesser-known but crucial aspects of how CFD prop firms operate is the practice known as B-booking. Almost all, if not all, prop firms utilise a B-book model, where instead of passing client orders to the external market or liquidity providers (A-booking), they internalise these trades. This means that the firm becomes more of a data collector to the trader’s position, effectively “warehousing” the orders within their own systems.
“Based on my observations, the majority of prop firms are relying on internal order processing,” Brokeree’s Marketing Manager, Anton Sokolov, told Finance Magnates. “Although we are seeing a completely different model for brokerage-backed firms, B-book is still the favoured model by far.”
Sometimes, prop firms have to B-book the orders out of necessity as well.
“The amount of data you can collect from a trader before they’re funded is insufficient to make any decision,” highlighted James Glyde, CEO at PipFirm. “The rules required to enable a prop firm to operate an A-book model would be highly unpopular with the average trader.”
The advantages of B-booking for the firms include reduced execution costs, as no real market transactions occur, and the potential to profit from customers who lose the fee paid with little risk to the firm.
Challenges of B-Book
However, this model of B-booking the traders introduces several challenges.
One of the key challenges is risk concentration. By not hedging or passing client trades to external liquidity, CFD prop firms assume all the risk associated with these positions. The firm could face considerable financial exposure if a significant portion of its client base trades in the same direction, especially with leveraged trades.As the participants mature in the marketplace, nefarious behaviour has become more frequent. An influx of so-called “finfluencers” have figured out ways and methods to pass prop firm accounts with zero risk in an attempt to gain a following by posting passing and payout certificates all over social media. This type of trading behaviour is random, and it is not really possible to effectively A-book as it holds no alpha. The only solution a prop firm really has is to remove this user from their database and prevent them from further purchases.“Upon entering the space, we thoroughly researched who the participants are in the niche and their behaviours. We spoke to some industry veterans to get an understanding of what to expect from the traders and looked at solutions prior to entering,” said Siju Daniel, CCO of ATFX and their proprietary trading arm ATFunded.
“It is important that anyone entering the space doesn’t do so blind; the types of order flow that a company can experience are vastly different to a brokerage, so having an idea of what to expect is key. The industry really cannot tolerate more bankruptcies.”
Conflict of Interest and Hedging Risks
The B-booking model, while legally permissible in many jurisdictions where CFDs are regulated, often draws criticism for potentially conflicting interests. Here, the firm’s profitability might inversely correlate with client success, leading to ethical concerns about transparency and fairness.
It is important that firms enter with the right intentions. Future regulation may look towards what plans for a firm’s order flow and ability to execute it rather than simple capital requirements.
Hedging is a critical strategy for managing risk, but this becomes a complex endeavour for CFD prop firms.
When using a B-book model, traditional hedging becomes more about internal risk management rather than external market offsetting. The firm might use other internal positions to hedge or rely on predictive analytics to manage exposure, but this internal approach doesn’t always align perfectly with real market movements.
Further, there are volatility and exposure risks as well. CFDs are leveraged products, amplifying both potential gains and losses. If the market moves against the firm’s net position significantly, especially in times of high volatility, the risk can escalate quickly due to the absence of natural hedges from external market interactions. The brokerage industry is extremely familiar with this scenario when the EURCHF cap was removed, and the currency moved 30%.Notably, the risks of the prop firms are much higher than those of CFD brokers.
In a typical scenario, suppose a funded trader has paid $500 for a 100k challenge and passed the first time. Their maximum loss is 10%, and their profit share is 80%. If that trader makes a 5% profit, they’ll receive $4,000 (700% ROI), and the firm has $1,000. Suppose the trader breaches their account by losing the 10% max loss. The firm is down $9,000, while the trader is up $4,000.
“Once a trader is funded, even with a large number of funded traders, the risk is skewed towards the firm, while the profit is skewed towards the trader,” Glyde added. “The most likely risk (trader failing) has a fixed limit, while the unlikely risk (trader making over 10% profit) is unlimited. While the risk is unlimited in a typical B-book CFD, props cannot transfer risk as CFD brokers can.”
Data Utilization for Revenue: The Two-Fold Challenge
Prop firms need sophisticated tools to predict market movements and manage internal risk. The data they collect from client trades should ideally inform these predictions, but the correlation between client behaviour and market movement isn’t always straightforward. This predictive capability is crucial for revenue but is often limited by the quality and quantity of data and the algorithms used for analysis.
Prop firms will need to adopt almost ‘data fitting’ rules to use the data over the long term accurately and allow systems to grow with the user base, knowing that data fits into pre-set parameters that the system is familiar with.While firms collect vast amounts of trading data, converting this into revenue without directly competing with clients (which could conflict with their business model) is tricky. The most likely scenario for monetisation is successful dealing methods to offset the money-in-to-payout ratio. Most of the fallen prop firms would not have fallen if only they had a portion of their outflows covered from other sources.
“The main risk is that the company cuts out additional revenue sources and has to rely on fees collected from trading challenge sales and other services,” Sokolov added. “Whereas firms that hedge b-booked trades in one way or another are able to benefit from the traders activity directly. That’s why we’ve seen so many brands close down due to insolvency after being unable to pay out traders profit splits – they only had a single source of revenue.”
“However, running a B-book first firm does not mean a company is destined to fail as long as they are aware of the money ins and outs of their business or are hedging their risks for the symbols high exposure.”
CFD prop firms operate in a niche where they must balance the allure of high leverage with the inherent risks of managing order flow and hedging. The B-booking strategy, while profitable, complicates traditional risk management practices, requiring firms to innovate in how they use data, manage internal risk, and maintain ethical standards. The sector continues to evolve, with firms seeking new ways to leverage technology and data analytics to navigate these challenges while ensuring sustainable business practices. As larger, more sophisticated players enter the marketplace, the industry moight be on the verge of seeing a disruption to an otherwise tired marketplace, bringing new participants into the hands of old professionals.
This article was written by Arnab Shome at www.financemagnates.com.
Feed from Financemagnates.com
Instead of weakening, the Pound Sterling (GBP) is more likely to trade in a 1.2620/1.2710 range.
Стужка ад Fxstreet.com
The Reserve Bank of New Zealand (RBNZ) announced a 50 basis points rate cut and Governor Orr suggested a similar rate cut could take place in February.
Feed from Admiralmarkets.com
An AI startup founder was approached by some investors, claiming to have ties with multiple billionaire families, with an offer of a massive investment. Although they were very convincing, the startup founder ended up loosing about $50,000 only to realise that he was duped by an alleged organized scammer group.
According to Dr Daniel Veidlinger, a professor at California State University, Chico, and an investor in the unnamed AI startup, the scammers approached the startup’s founder with a $5 million investment proposal and then scammed the founder of about $50,000 in crypto.
The startup CEO coincidently recorded the Zoom call over which the scammers tricked him to send the cryptocurrencies. However, the startup and the founder remained anonymous.
Bait and Hook: A Sophisticated Scam
The scammers’ approach as fake investors was highly organised, Dr Veidlinger’s account showed. At least four individuals were involved in the scheme.
In mid-June, one of the scammers, posing as an “International Relationship Manager” of an asset management company, contacted the startup’s CEO, expressing interest in investing in the company.
After further communication and the execution of a non-disclosure agreement (NDA), the initial scammer introduced the startup CEO to another scammer posing as the portfolio manager of the so-called asset management firm. This individual claimed to be a member of two billionaire families, one on his father’s side and the other on his mother’s side.
This second scammer held Zoom calls with the startup CEO and expressed interest in investing USD 5 million in the company. However, he abruptly withdrew from discussions, citing an unspecified “personal emergency.”
The first scammer then introduced a third individual, who presented himself as the CEO of the fake asset management company and claimed to be the “nephew” of a billionaire Swiss art dealer.
Notably, Luxembourg’s financial regulator had flagged the website of the purported asset management firm for fraudulent activity. However, the regulatory warning came after the people operating the website allegedly scammed the AI startup.
According to Dr Veidlinger, this third scammer continued to promise a USD 5 million investment in the AI startup. He claimed to hold EUR 5 million in cash that he intended to invest via a convertible debt instrument to avoid certain Swiss tax liabilities.
After negotiations over several Zoom calls, the fake investors increased their supposed investment to USD 8 million. The startup CEO even engaged a corporate law firm to draft an investment agreement, which the scammers approved.
A week after receiving the agreement, the scammer posing as the CEO claimed that his CFO had advised him to set aside USD 1.2 million— the total interest on the USD 8 million convertible debt investment — in a cryptocurrency wallet for three months for regulatory compliance. He further stated that this amount would be drawn from his initial investment, presenting this as part of the investment process.
Catch: Fiat Investment to Crypto Wallet Request
The scammers then moved to the “catch” stage, making an unusual request. They asked the startup CEO to create a cryptocurrency wallet and deposit at least USD 400,000 into it to prove the startup’s financial capability, Dr Veidlinger pointed out.
The startup CEO, unable to use company funds, offered to deposit USD 50,000 of his personal funds. At this stage, Dr Veidlinger, an investor in the startup, was asked to assist in setting up the wallet.
Dr Veidlinger initially created a Coinbase wallet, deposited approximately USD 51,000 in USDT, and shared the wallet details with the scammers. However, the scammers claimed the wallet could not be verified on the blockchain and asked for the funds to be transferred to a Trust Wallet address.
Although Dr Veidlinger complied and the funds were verified on Trust Wallet, the scammers then requested the funds be stored on Atomic Wallet. Despite finding this unusual, Dr Veidlinger agreed.
During a subsequent Zoom call, the scammer posing as the CEO introduced another individual, referred to as his nephew, who asked to verify the funds on Atomic Wallet. Although the funds had already been verified on Etherscan, the startup CEO complied.
The scammers then requested a live transaction during the Zoom call, as per Dr Veidlinger. They instructed the startup CEO to send USD 5 in USDT from his wallet to theirs, asking him to manually input the amount and scan a QR code. However, the QR code embedded the transaction amount, overriding the manually entered amount. As a result, the startup CEO inadvertently sent nearly USD 50,000 in USDT.
The scammers exploited a basic vulnerability in Atomic Wallet interface. Although the startup CEO manually entered USD 5, the QR code embedded a higher transfer amount, which appeared as USD 5 on the confirmation screen but sent USD 50,000 in reality.
The startup CEO confronted the scammers, who refused to return the funds and subsequently cut off all communication.
“The day of the theft – August 23, 2024 – would have been the last time startup CEO’s ever communicated with the scammers,” Dr Veidlinger told Finance Magnates. “They did their best to first deny the theft and then to pressure him (the startup founder) not to public with the details and recordings… When scammers realized they could not dissuade startup’s CEO from going public, they broke off all contact.”
Dr Veidlinger confirmed to Finance Magnates that the stolen funds could not be recovered. The funds were moved in small amounts to over a dozen destinations and cashed out on two exchanges: Bitget and Binance. Dr Veidlinger, who managed the crypto wallet, and the startup also filed complaints with the law enforcements in North America and Europe, however, none of them receive any update on the actions. They also reported the interface vulnerability to Trust Wallet, only to receive a scripted message from the support team.
“Even though the startup has engaged a law firm, it has been advised that probability of funds recovery is practically zero given multiple jurisdictions involved. Never mind the difficulty of bringing litigation against people whose identity and domicile we do not know,” Dr Veidlinger.
Finance Magnates reached out to Trust Wallet to know about the vulnerability and also Tesalia Asset Management, the platform Dr Veidlinger accused to be operated by the scammers, but did not receive any reply from either.
This article was written by Arnab Shome at www.financemagnates.com.
Feed from Financemagnates.com
The Pound Sterling (GBP) climbs back up into the 1.2660s on Tuesday as market sentiment switches against the US Dollar (USD).
Стужка ад Fxstreet.com
Fundamental Overview
The US Dollar continues to consolidate around the highs as the market reached the peak in the repricing of interest rates expectations and it will need stronger reasons to price out the remaining rate cuts for 2025.
This was signalled by the lack of US Dollar strength after lots of strong US data with the market’s pricing remaining largely unchanged around three rate cuts by the end of 2025. We might see the greenback remaining on the backfoot at least until the US CPI due next week.
Yesterday, Fed’s Waller і Fed’s Williams sounded like a rate cut in December is basically a done deal with the plan to slow the pace of rate cuts considerably in 2025. We will likely need another hot CPI report to force them to skip the December cut.
On the AUD side, the market expects just two rate cuts by the RBA next year with the first one fully priced in for May 2025. The Australian economic data remains solid while inflation continues to fall slowly keeping the central bank in a neutral stance.
AUDUSD Technical Analysis – Daily Timeframe
On the daily chart, we can see that AUDUSD is stuck in a range between the 0.6440 support and the 0.6540 resistance. The market participants will likely keep on playing the range until we get a breakout on either side.
AUDUSD Technical Analysis – 4 hour Timeframe
On the 4 hour chart, we can see that we have a very strong resistance zone around the 0.6540 level where we can also find the major trendline for confluence.
That’s where we can expect the sellers to step in with a defined risk above the resistance to position for the continuation of the downtrend. The buyers, on the other hand, will want to see the price breaking higher to invalidate the bearish setup and position for a rally into the next resistance at 0.6687.
AUDUSD Technical Analysis – 1 hour Timeframe
On the 1 hour chart, we can see that we have a minor upward trendline defining the current pullback into the resistance. The buyers will likely lean on it to keep pushing higher, while the sellers will look for a break lower to target a break below the support. The red lines define the average daily range for today.
Upcoming Catalysts
Today, we get the US Job Openings data. Tomorrow, we have the US ADP, the US ISM Services PMI and Fed Chair Powell speaking. On Thursday, we get the latest US Jobless Claims figures. Finally, on Friday, we conclude the week with the US NFP report.
This article was written by Giuseppe Dellamotta at www.forexlive.com.
Feed from Forexlive.com
USD/JPY has found support just above the 100-day Simple Moving Average (SMA) at 148.96 and bounced.
Стужка ад Fxstreet.com
![HDFC Bank Indian stocks Elliott Wave technical analysis [Video]](https://i0.wp.com/mmfx.vvip-members.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/hdfc-bank-indian-stocks-elliott-wave-technical-analysis-video.png?resize=400%2C250&ssl=1)
Function: Larger Degree Trend Higher (Intermediate degree, orange).
Стужка ад Fxstreet.com
