The Dow Jones Industrial Average trades near 53,900 on Monday, lower by three tenths of a percent and pinned to the bottom of a session that has covered barely 200 points, the narrowest daily bar in weeks. Every price of the day sits inside Friday’s range, and Friday’s sat inside Thursday’s. The index spent most of the session waiting for Wednesday’s inflation print, and has spent the afternoon reacting to something else entirely.
The largest single-name move of the session again belongs to a company outside the average. Intel (INTC) fell 3% after saying it would sell 15 billion Dollars of common stock, and none of that reaches the index, exactly as none of Tuesday’s biggest gain did.
Labour’s smallest share since 1947
Thursday’s second-quarter productivity report carried the number of the week and almost nobody printed it. The labour share, the portion of output reaching workers as pay, fell to 52.9%, the lowest reading in a series that starts in 1947. Unit non-labour payments, the other half of the same ledger, rose 14% at an annual rate.
An index printing records while payrolls contract is not a contradiction in need of explaining away. Equity is a claim on precisely the share of output that expanded, and the workforce holds the share that shrank. Friday’s payroll contraction and last week’s high are one piece of arithmetic read from opposite ends.
Wages are not the inflation
The complaint in circulation, that disappointing productivity explains why workers keep losing ground, does not survive the release it is drawn from. Output per hour rose 1.4% in the quarter and 2.2% from a year earlier, and the cycle has compounded at 2.1% a year, matching the long-run rate since 1947. Hourly compensation rose 2.7% and fell 3.1% once consumer prices come out of it.
Unit labour costs rose 1.3% on the same page, which is the awkward line for a committee holding rates against an inflation it cannot trace to pay. The value-added price deflator on that release ran near 7% against those labour costs, leaving energy, tariffs and margin to carry it. Wednesday’s print will be argued as a labour-market story and it is not one.
Only Crude Oil sold the peace back
West Texas Intermediate Crude Oil trades roughly 3% higher near $81 and Brent above the $86 handle, and the headlines behind that move hardened as the session wore on. Iran’s foreign minister ruled out restarting talks until Washington answers for what Tehran calls breaches of June’s framework, the president has since said he intends to demand compensation from Iran, and Tehran is now reported to have abandoned negotiation with this administration altogether for the remainder of the term, out to 2029.
Treat the last of those as unconfirmed and it still changes the trade. A deal that slips postpones a risk premium and a counterparty that leaves the table capitalises it, because a toll regime nobody is negotiating away stops being a headline and becomes a standing cost of moving a barrel. A demand for compensation points the same way, since claims are litigated rather than agreed inside a quarter.
The pressure is administrative rather than rhetorical, and it ran through the financial system again on Friday, when Washington’s sanctions office issued two fresh Iranian designations, the eighth action this year aimed at the shadow banking apparatus. The body Tehran created to charge tolls for safe passage through the Strait was itself designated in May, so an Oman-brokered reopening that leaves Iran directing traffic runs through a sanctioned counterparty. That is the half of the trade equities bought at 54,740 last week and have only now begun to sell back.
The rates market took the same headlines more seriously than the equity market did. A quarter-point increase on September 16 now prices at 49.9% against 50.1% for a hold, up from 44.1% on Friday, and October 28 has firmed to 76.5%. December still gives the current range no chance at all, and the second increase that Friday’s payroll contraction was supposed to have buried is back at 24.1%, from 14.4% in a single session.
The data week
July’s Consumer Price Index (CPI) lands on Wednesday at 12:30 GMT, forecast at 0.1% MoM against a 0.4% decline in June, the annual rate easing to 3.4% from 3.5%, core at 0.2% MoM and 2.5% YoY. That print measures a month already stale against a barrel 3% higher today, which is the standing problem with reading the war out of backward-looking data.
Thursday carries the Producer Price Index (PPI) at 0.2% MoM against a 0.3% decline, core at 4.2% YoY from 4.7%, and jobless claims at 201K. Two regional Federal Reserve presidents speak inside half an hour that morning, one of them among the three who dissented for a quarter-point increase in July. Friday brings retail sales at 0.2% and a Michigan sentiment reading seen falling to 54 from 55.2. Those three releases decide which side of that coin September lands on.
Levels and bias
Resistance: Just above 54,000 has stalled each of the last two sessions, with the 54,100 area capping Friday. Above them the record just short of 54,750 is the only structure left on the chart.
Support: The 53,800 area has floored three consecutive sessions and is the line the week turns on. Beneath it the tape thins toward 53,500, with nothing structural until the 50-day Exponential Moving Average (EMA) near 52,100.
Bias: Bullish while the 53,800 area holds, with the record just short of 54,750 as the objective and a daily Stochastic Relative Strength Index (Stoch RSI) near 57 carrying room above it. A daily close beneath 53,800 turns three sessions of contraction into a failed breakout and opens 53,500.
Dow Jones daily chart
Futures FAQs
The futures market is an exchange-based auction in which participants buy and sell contracts of an underlying asset at a predetermined future date and price. The set price is agreed upon today and is derived from the underlying asset. Futures contracts can be based on a wide range of assets, with commodities among the most popular, although currencies and indices are other common underlying assets. Futures prices depend on their underlying asset and act as a mechanism for firms, institutions, and large-position traders to manage risks through hedging.
Futures can be traded in different ways. The most common ways are via a regulated exchange or via Contracts For Difference (CFDs). In the former, liquidity is high and pricing is more transparent, with the broker serving only as an intermediary between you and the market. Still, it generally requires more capital. The largest futures exchanges are the Chicago Mercantile Exchange (CME) and the New York Mercantile Exchange (NYME). As for CFDs, these require less capital and thus trading is more flexible, but at the cost of less transparency.
The E-mini S&P 500 index, Crude Oil (Brent, WTI), Natural Gas, Gold, Silver, Copper, and soft commodities such as grains are among the most actively traded contracts. These offer strong liquidity and are closely followed by traders worldwide. Futures market volume consistently exceeds spot market volume, often significantly. This dominance is driven by leverage, hedging, and higher liquidity on exchanges.
Yes. Future gauges, particularly equity index futures such as those of the S&P 500 or the Nasdaq, are widely considered key gauges of market sentiment because they reflect investors’ expectations for the next session’s opening price. When equity futures drop, it is a sign of risk-aversion, signaling bearish market sentiment. On the contrary, rising equity futures suggest markets are risk on.
As a futures contract approaches its maturity date, the futures price converges upon the spot price, becoming almost identical at expiration. However, prices can diverge significantly before the contract ends. A market is in contango when future prices are higher than spot prices, while the mirror image is called backwardation (when current prices are higher than future prices). For commodities, the normal state of the market is contango because holding the asset over time incurs costs such as storage or insurance fees. When markets turn from contango to backwardation – or vice versa – it signals a shift in the trend: a change from contango to backwardation is taken as a bullish sign, while going from backwardation to contango is generally considered bearish.
Feed from Fxstreet.com